When I first started this class, I had no idea what and interdisciplinary unit was. Not being a teacher, I had just assumed that most teachers had to follow district curriculum and didn’t have much say in what was being taught. After taking this class, I have learned that it doesn’t (and shouldn’t) have to be that way. Here are just a few things I have learned ITU’s provide for students and teachers:
· ITU’s bring in students interests. Children are curious human beings and teachers using ITU’s take those curiosities and turn them in the teaching opportunities.
· Because the students have more of a say in what they are learning, ITU’s encourage them to take charge of their education.
· ITU’s encourage teamwork, not only amongst the students but with the teachers as well.
· Learning opportunities are reinforced because they are learning different aspects of the ITU theme in each class.
· ITU’s provide a variety of teaching styles to the students, therefore reaching more students. Its not just lecture/pen/paper teaching. ITU’s are more hands on, and many students who have learning disabilities learn easier when they have something to do vs. just listening and trying the retain what is spoken to them.
Being a behavior therapist, I would like to see more classrooms adapt to this teaching style. Many of my students need more than just a lecture/pen/paper teaching style to be able to retain what is being taught. They need hands on activities, projects that promote students helping one another, themes that interest and encourage them to do their best, themes that are tied together in every subject to reinforce what they are learning, and opportunities to tie in what they are learning in the classroom to the outside community. This is what an interdisciplinary unit does.
As much as I like and respect ITU’s, I am still a little confused as to how a teacher can apply them when they are given required curriculum to follow? My husband is a teacher and when he first taught, he was at a very large school district. He had to follow the curriculum handed to him and there was no wiggle room. He pretty much had no say as to what was being taught to the students. Now he works at a charter school, and it’s a completely different story. Because his school doesn’t have to follow state curriculum rules and guidelines, my husband has a lot more say as to what’s being taught to his students, as long as it complies with state standards. This is not heard of in most schools that I work in. And I still struggle with the idea of the students having complete say over what is being taught and then the teacher having to create curriculum based off of that. I am more of a type A personality, and I like to have things organized and ready to go before I start my day. So I think that I would struggle with allowing my students to have complete control over what they are learning. But again, there is a variety of teaching styles within an ITU and a teacher can modify their teaching style to fit them.
I believe that technology plays a huge role in the classroom. Living in California, I wouldn’t be able to take my masters classes at UWF without technology. Using the Wiki this semester has been a huge help in getting our group project completed. It provided a way for 5 people, who do not know or live near each other, to work together to create our collaborative ITU. It was nice to use the group discussion area to be able to connect with fellow classmates and communicate amongst one another. I really appreciated using the general discussion section because different people asked questions that either I had or didn’t even think about. For future classrooms, I think technology is another tool that can be used to enhance learning opportunities. A few of my students use technology as a way to communicate (i.e. telecommunicating systems) and would not be able to communicate with others if they did not have that machine. Teachers should not be afraid to use technology in the classroom. I don’t think it should be the only tool used, but it is definitely a useful one to use.
My overall experience with the collaborative ITU was pretty good. The Wiki made it easy to upload all our info so that everyone could see how the project was coming along, we agreed on a theme right a way and the subjects, and overall I think we all worked well together. Not knowing one another and communicating via the internet most of the time made things more difficult. For me personally, I struggled with some of my teammates work habits and trying to make things work without being pushy. Its difficult to constructively criticize someone’s work when A) I don’t know him/her and B) our only form of communication was through the Wiki. I do believe that some team members worked more on the project than others but I think this can be common in group projects. Even through these struggles, I do believe we created a great ITU and I am happy it is over!
Feedback:
I’ll be honest in saying that I struggled with this class. I do feel that this class is geared more towards teachers, and I am not a teacher. I feel like we had a lot more guidance at the beginning of the class, when we were learning about integrated teaching styles. Then when it came to our actual projects I felt like we were left out on our own. I really appreciated the Best Practices project and had thought I’d done a pretty good job, but was not happy with my grade. I felt like I was guessing at what I was supposed to be doing because there really wasn’t any instruction given. I had an example and the rubric to go off of. I felt the same with the lesson plan. I have never written a lesson plan and think that there really should have been more teaching on how to write a lesson plan before we were just thrown into that project. Again, I think that this class is a great class for teachers, but I felt lost because that is not my primary training.